HDFC SILVER ETF FUND OF…₹38.97▲4.29% TATA SILVER ETF FUND OF…₹30.92▲4.27% DSP SILVER ETF₹24.52▲4.18% NIPPON INDIA SILVER ETF₹35.92▲4.16% UTI SILVER ETF₹30.16▲4.15% MIRAE ASSET SILVER ETF₹10.51▲4.11% SBI SILVER ETF₹25.14▲4.07% ZERODHA SILVER ETF₹21.50▲4.05% ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE S…₹36.60▲4.03% GROWW SILVER ETF₹22.87▲3.98% HDFC SILVER ETF FUND OF…₹38.97▲4.29% TATA SILVER ETF FUND OF…₹30.92▲4.27% DSP SILVER ETF₹24.52▲4.18% NIPPON INDIA SILVER ETF₹35.92▲4.16% UTI SILVER ETF₹30.16▲4.15% MIRAE ASSET SILVER ETF₹10.51▲4.11% SBI SILVER ETF₹25.14▲4.07% ZERODHA SILVER ETF₹21.50▲4.05% ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE S…₹36.60▲4.03% GROWW SILVER ETF₹22.87▲3.98%
GFS GFSGayatri Financial Synergy
/
Client Login
AMFI-registered Mutual Fund Distributor · ARN-169480

Every number here comes from somewhere you can check.

Gayatri Financial Synergy has served over 12,000 investors across Faridabad and Delhi NCR since 2002. This platform publishes 1,648 schemes from 50 fund houses, priced from AMFI’s own NAV files as at 20 Aug 2026 — and names the source behind each figure.

Invest · Earn · Enjoy.

INVESTORS SERVED
12,000+
Faridabad & Delhi NCR, since 2002
SCHEMES PUBLISHED
1,648
across 50 fund houses, 51 sub-categories
NAV AS AT
20 Aug 2026
on 1,648 of 1,648 schemes · 100%
YEARS OPERATING
24
Faridabad & Delhi NCR, since 2002
SCHEMES WE RATE
0
of 1,648 — a distributor does not rate

What this platform actually does

Six things, all of them arithmetic on a published price history. Each one carries the number of schemes it can honestly be run on.

Screen the whole universe
Filter and sort every published scheme by category, return, cost, volatility or worst fall. Each column is a number an AMC or AMFI has already put on the record.
1,648 schemes · 51 sub-categories · 50 fund houses
Rolling-window returns
Every three- and five-year holding period in a scheme’s own history, not one flattering start date. Best, worst and median, so the spread of real outcomes is visible.
1,086 of 1,648 schemes have a 3-year spread · 65.9%
Drawdown and recovery
The worst peak-to-trough fall in the scheme’s NAV history, how long it stayed under water, and whether the earlier peak was ever regained.
1,635 of 1,648 schemes · 99.2%
SIP against lumpsum
The same money invested two ways along the same real price path — a monthly instalment as XIRR against a single lumpsum as CAGR — and the gap between them.
1,114 of 1,648 schemes over three years · 67.6%
Cost shown next to return
The disclosed expense ratio sits beside performance with its category average, because a one-percent fee gap quietly eats a year of gains every decade.
1,293 of 1,648 schemes carry a disclosed expense ratio
The price path, published
Every chart reads a per-scheme NAV file this site publishes — daily for the last three years, weekly before that. You can open the file and check the line.
1,648 of 1,648 schemes · 100% · data/nav/

Where every number comes from

Four sources feed the whole site. Nothing else does. A field that none of them carries is left blank and shown as a dash, never filled in with an estimate.

AMFI NAV history
portal.amfiindia.com ↗
The daily NAV file published by the Association of Mutual Funds in India. Every NAV, day change and 52-week range on this site comes from it, and so does everything computed on top: point-to-point returns, rolling windows, drawdown, recovery, SIP-versus-lumpsum.
1,648 of 1,648
100% of schemes priced
AMFI scheme master
portal.amfiindia.com ↗
AMFI’s own scheme register: the legal scheme name, ISIN, scheme type, launch date and minimum investment. It is what lets a scheme on this site be matched to the exact scheme in a fund house’s documents.
1,647 of 1,648
99.9% carry a launch date
AMC disclosures
Each fund house’s own factsheets and monthly portfolio statements
Total expense ratio and its category average, the riskometer band, the benchmark, the fund manager and the exit load. These are disclosed by the AMCs rather than by AMFI, which is why their coverage is lower — and why the gap is shown instead of filled.
1,293 of 1,648
78.5% carry AMC-disclosed fields
This site’s NAV path files
data/nav/_index.json ↗
site/data/nav/<slug>.json carries the scheme’s NAV path: daily for the last three years, one point per week before that, with the observations either side of any unit re-basing always retained.
1,648 of 1,648
100% have a published series

NAV as at 20 Aug 2026; short-period returns as at 20 Aug 2026; annualised returns, risk and disclosed holdings as at 20 Aug 2026. Two things move on different clocks: the nightly AMFI file carries NAV only, so returns, risk and holdings stay where the last full build left them. There is no hand-editing step in between.

How the “rankings” work

Every ordered list on this site is a sort on one published number — three-year return, expense ratio, standard deviation, worst drawdown. The column being sorted is always named, and the sort runs the same way for every scheme in the category, including the ones GFS does not distribute.

There is no blended score, no weighting we chose, and no editorial thumb on the scale. Change the column and the order changes with it. That is the whole mechanism.

Why GFS does not rate schemes

GFS is an AMFI-registered distributor (ARN-169480), not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. It does not rate schemes.

A factual sort on a number an AMC has already published is reporting. A star rating, a score or a buy-sell-hold call on a named third-party scheme is a quality judgement, and that is a different job with a different registration behind it. So the rating field exists in our data and is empty on all 1,648 schemes.

Method, in the platform’s own words

Printed straight from the data module that computes them, so the description cannot drift away from the maths.

Rolling returns
Every 3-year and 5-year holding period in the scheme’s own NAV history, stepped one week at a time, annualised. Windows overlap. n is the number of windows. Periods spanning a unit re-basing are excluded. Past performance; not indicative of future returns.
Drawdown & recovery
Largest peak-to-trough fall in the scheme’s NAV history and, where it happened, the date the earlier peak was regained. Measured on NAV, so it is after the scheme’s expenses. Segments either side of a unit re-basing are measured separately.
SIP vs lumpsum
A fixed monthly instalment on the same calendar day (XIRR) against a single lumpsum on the first day (CAGR), both over the scheme’s actual NAV path for the stated period. gapPct is sipXirr minus lumpCagr in percentage points.
Cost
expense is the scheme’s disclosed total expense ratio; catExpense is the category average as disclosed in the source. Neither is a projection.

What GFS does not do

The list below is the reason to trust the one above it. Each line is a thing this platform is structurally unable to do, not a promise to behave.

No paid placement
No AMC has paid to appear on this site, to rank higher in any table, or to be included at all. There are no sponsored rows and no promoted schemes. The screener sorts fund houses GFS distributes and fund houses it does not by exactly the same rule.
No ratings, no calls
0 of 1,648 schemes carry a GFS star rating, score, or buy-sell-hold call. The field exists in the data and is empty everywhere, on purpose.
No performance promises
Nothing here projects what a scheme will return. The rolling-window figures report what already happened across every holding period in the record — the worst window is shown next to the best one.
No invented numbers
A value is either derived from a named source or it is a dash. 0 of 1,648 schemes display a scheme-level AUM, because no source we use carries one.
No quiet commission
GFS distributes Regular Plans and may earn a commission on them. That is disclosed here, in the trust section, rather than in the footnotes — and the analytics side takes no money from any AMC.
No transactions, no tracking
The analytics side of this site accepts no orders and no payments. Watchlists, quiz answers and preferences stay in your own browser; no server receives them and no cookie follows you.

What this data does not cover

Rival platforms show these fields whether or not they have them. Here they are blank, and here is why — each reason is read out of the data module itself, alongside how many of the 1,648 schemes actually carry the field.

Scheme-level AUM 0 of 1,648
Scheme-level AUM is not in the source; only AMC-total AUM, which is a different number.
Stock-level holdings 1,070 of 1,648
Stock-level holdings are carried for 1070 of the 1648 schemes here, from the fund houses' own monthly portfolio disclosures as at 31 Jul 2026. The rest are blank for one of two reasons: their fund house has not been ingested (9 of 50 houses), or the disclosure did not pass the checks this dataset applies before publishing a portfolio under a scheme's name — it did not reconcile to the total the AMC itself states, its weights did not add up, its largest rows carried a category label instead of a security name, or two disclosed schemes both claimed the same catalogue row.
Ten-year returns 539 of 1,648
No scheme in this set carries a ten-year return in the source, so the 10Y column is a dash everywhere rather than a figure stitched together from a shorter record.
Beta and alpha — of 1,648
No benchmark series in the source.
Minimum SIP amount — of 1,648
Not present in the source.
A GFS rating 0 of 1,648
GFS is an AMFI-registered distributor (ARN-169480), not a SEBI-registered investment adviser. It does not rate schemes.

History is partial, and the page says so

A scheme launched eighteen months ago genuinely has no three-year number. Rather than infer one, the site shows a dash. This is how much of the universe each period actually covers.

1-year return 90.5% · 1,491 schemes
3-year return 68% · 1,121 schemes
5-year return 48.8% · 804 schemes
10-year return 32.7% · 539 schemes

Office & contact

Registered office
Gayatri Financial Synergy
SCO-39, 1st Floor, HUDA Market
Sector-7, Faridabad
Haryana 121006
Grievances
Write to info@gfswc.com first. Unresolved complaints can be escalated on SEBI SCORES; the investor charter and escalation matrix live on the policies page.
Contact us Open the screener Meet the research desk