GFS » Tools » Fund comparison

What do these two schemes hold in common?

Pick two schemes. Each measure below is computed from disclosed data and shown separately, with its formula and its source. Nothing here is combined into a single score.

Which measure this page is showing: common holdings, as at 31 Jul 2026

Both of these schemes disclose a portfolio, so the figure below is a count and a weight taken directly from those two filings — the securities they both hold, and how much of each fund sits in them. Securities are matched on ISIN, never on name. Each measure on this page is shown on its own with its formula and its source; none of them is combined into a score, and none of them is a rating, a ranking, a verdict or a recommendation.

Scheme A

Axis

Axis Nifty Next 50 Index Fund Axis · Index Funds · Regular Growth

Scheme B

DSP

DSP Nifty Next 50 Index Fund DSP · Index Funds · Regular Growth

Search covers all 1648 schemes in this dataset, NAV as at 03 Sep 2026. 1070 of them carry a disclosed portfolio as at 31 Jul 2026.

Try a pair

Axis Nifty Next 50 Index Fund DSP Nifty Next 50 Index Fund

5 of 6 disclosed markers match

Both are benchmarked to NIFTY NEXT 50 - TRI. Both track that index rather than pick stocks, so their mandates point at the same list of securities. That is a statement about what they are built to do; what they actually held on 31 Jul 2026 is measured above. The cheaper of the two costs 0.23% a year against 0.36%.

Securities held by both Computed in your browser from both disclosures

99.7% of net assets is held by both schemes at the same time

Sum, over the 50 securities both schemes disclose, of whichever of the two weights is smaller. Securities are matched on ISIN. Weights are percent of net assets as each fund house filed them on 31 Jul 2026.

Securities in both

of 50 in A and 50 in B

In A only

weight A holds that B does not

In B only

weight B holds that A does not

Security held by bothABCommon

Divi's Laboratories LimitedINE361B01024 · Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 4% 4% 4%

TVS Motor Company LimitedINE494B01023 · Automobiles 4% 4% 4%

Tata Motors LtdINE1TAE01010 · Agricultural, Commercial & Construction Vehicles 3.6% 3.6% 3.6%

Hindustan Aeronautics LimitedINE066F01020 · Aerospace & Defense 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%

Adani Power LimitedINE814H01029 · Power 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%

Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company LtdINE121A01024 · Finance 3.2% 3.2% 3.2%

Torrent Pharmaceuticals LimitedINE685A01028 · Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 3% 3% 3%

Cummins India LimitedINE298A01020 · Industrial Products 2.9% 2.9% 2.9%

Samvardhana Motherson International LimitedINE775A01035 · Auto Components 2.6% 2.6% 2.6%

The Indian Hotels Company LimitedINE053A01029 · Leisure Services 2.6% 2.6% 2.6%

Bharat Petroleum Corporation LimitedINE029A01011 · Petroleum Products 2.6% 2.6% 2.6%

Britannia Industries LimitedINE216A01030 · Food Products 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%

Tata Power Company LimitedINE245A01021 · Power 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%

Avenue Supermarts LimitedINE192R01011 · Retailing 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%

Power Finance Corporation LimitedINE134E01011 · Finance 2.4% 2.4% 2.4%

Varun Beverages LimitedINE200M01039 · Beverages 2.4% 2.4% 2.4%

CG Power and Industrial Solutions LimitedINE067A01029 · Electrical Equipment 2.3% 2.3% 2.3%

Adani Energy Solutions LimitedINE931S01010 · Power 2.1% 2.1% 2.1%

HDFC Asset Management Company LimitedINE127D01025 · Capital Markets 2.1% 2.1% 2.1%

Indian Oil Corporation LimitedINE242A01010 · Petroleum Products 2.1% 2.1% 2.1%

Pidilite Industries LimitedINE318A01026 · Chemicals & Petrochemicals 2% 2% 2%

Bajaj Holdings & Investment LimitedINE118A01012 · Finance 1.9% 1.9% 1.9%

GAIL (India) LimitedINE129A01019 · Gas 1.9% 1.9% 1.9%

REC LimitedINE020B01018 · Finance 1.8% 1.8% 1.8%

Adani Green Energy LimitedINE364U01010 · Power 1.8% 1.8% 1.8%

Showing the 25 largest common holdings by common weight; 25 more are counted in the figures above but not listed. A and B are each scheme’s own disclosed weight in that security; Common is the smaller of the two. Disclosed securities total 99.7% of net assets for A and 99.8% for B, which is the ceiling this measure can reach. Cash and cash-equivalent lines are excluded: 0.3% of A, 0.2% of B.

Method: Common holdings between two schemes are matched on ISIN and never on name — the same security appears under many different names across fund houses. The overlap percentage is the sum, over securities both schemes hold, of the smaller of the two weights. It is bounded by the smaller scheme’s disclosed security weight, so a scheme holding cash or derivatives against part of its net assets cannot reach 100 percent. Rows with no ISIN are excluded from the match rather than guessed at. Source: each fund house’s own monthly portfolio disclosure as at 31 Jul 2026, read from site/data/holdings/<slug>.json. A portfolio is a point-in-time filing and changes every month.

Mandate

MarkerScheme AScheme BMatch

SEBI sub-category Index Funds Index Funds same

Benchmark NIFTY NEXT 50 - TRI NIFTY NEXT 50 - TRI same

Broad category index index same

Fund house Axis DSP different

SEBI riskometer Very High Very High same

Plan / option Regular Growth Regular Growth same

Every marker is the string as filed for that scheme. "not disclosed" means the value is missing for at least one of the two in this dataset — it is counted as unknown, never as a mismatch, and it is left out of the count above.

Cost and behaviour

MeasureScheme AScheme BDifference

Expense ratio 0.23% 0.36% 0.13 pp · A lower

Category average expense 0.84% 0.84% same category

This scheme vs its category 0.61 pp below 0.48 pp below —

Volatility · 3Y annualised 19.75% 19.87% 0.12 pp · A lower

Max drawdown · 3Y -26.59% -26.69% 0.1 pp · A shallower

Sharpe ratio 0.65 0.66 0.01

NAV history here 4.5 yrs 7.4 yrs 2.9 yrs apart

Expense and its category average are as disclosed; neither is a projection. Volatility is the annualised standard deviation of daily NAV moves; max drawdown is the deepest peak-to-trough fall over the same window. That window is three years where the scheme has three years of NAV history and its actual span where it does not — it is stated for each scheme below. Sharpe is as disclosed in each scheme’s key-ratio feed. — means the figure is not in this dataset for that scheme — pp means percentage points. NAV history is what this dataset carries for the scheme, capped at ten years, not the age of the fund. Both are measured over 3Y, to 2026-09-03.

Return profile

PeriodScheme AScheme BGap

1M -1.54% -1.52% 0.02 pp

3M +4.43% +4.49% 0.06 pp

6M +7.98% +8.04% 0.06 pp

YTD +4.9% +5.03% 0.13 pp

1Y +8.1% +8.39% 0.29 pp

2Y CAGR -1.69% -1.45% 0.24 pp

3Y CAGR +17.04% +17.41% 0.37 pp

5Y CAGR — +11.62% —

Across the 7 periods both schemes disclose, their returns differ by 0.17 percentage points on average.

That average gap and the correlation above answer different questions. The gap is about how far apart the two finished; the correlation is about whether they travelled together on the way. A pair can move in near-perfect step and still finish percentage points apart. Past performance; not indicative of future returns.

NAV as at 03 Sep 2026; short-period returns as at 03 Sep 2026; annualised returns, cost and risk as at 24 July 2026; disclosed portfolios as at 31 Jul 2026. Everything here is either a restatement of disclosed data — mandate strings as filed, holdings as filed, returns, cost and risk as published — or a calculation performed on that data with its formula, its source and its sample size stated beside it. Each measure stands on its own; nothing is combined into a score. GFS is an AMFI-registered mutual fund distributor (ARN-169480), not a SEBI-registered investment adviser — nothing on this page is a rating, a ranking, a verdict or a recommendation. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risk; read all scheme related documents carefully.